The Morning Sixpack stays free because the news that shapes your life should not be hidden behind a paywall. Paid subscribers are not paying for access. They are helping fund the research, writing, and independent voice that goes into every issue. Become a paid subscriber and help keep smart, honest news analysis free for everyone.
A flydubai flight bound for Tel Aviv turned into a midair nightmare after an alleged cockpit stabbing sent the jet plunging nearly 19,000 feet before passengers and crew helped regain control—apparently the in-flight service was the least of anyone’s concerns.
Israel-Bound Flydubai Jet Plunges Nearly 19,000 Feet After Co-Pilot Stabs Pilot
A flydubai Boeing 737 MAX 8 carrying 174 passengers made an emergency landing in Saudi Arabia Wednesday after an alleged cockpit stabbing and attempted hijacking sent the Tel Aviv-bound jet into a terrifying descent. The flight from Dubai was cruising near 34,000 feet when Israeli reports said one pilot attacked the other and attempted to seize control of the aircraft.
“One pilot stabbed the other and tried to do 9/11,” an official told Israel’s Channel 12.
Passengers and crew reportedly rushed forward and subdued the alleged attacker as the aircraft dropped to roughly 15,400 feet in about 12 minutes. Israeli fighter jets were scrambled as a precaution, while bloodied passengers recorded videos from inside the cabin. “We were either going to crash or be murdered,” one passenger told I24 News. “It was like a terrorist attack in mid-air.”
The plane eventually landed safely in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia. Flydubai confirmed an incident occurred and said it was cooperating with authorities, adding, “Further updates will be issued as additional confirmed details become available.” Israeli security agencies reportedly were investigating the episode as suspected terrorism, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the situation was under control.
Passengers celebrated after touching down, but photos reportedly showed damage to the Boeing jet’s rudder following the rapid descent.
Editor: When passengers have to help save the airplane from someone inside the cockpit, “thank you for flying with us” hits a little differently.
Source: New York Post
Pete Hegseth is preparing to cut 20% of the military’s general and admiral positions, arguing the Pentagon needs fewer layers at the top—and apparently the brass is about to get polished with a chainsaw.
Hegseth Targets Pentagon’s Top Brass With 20% Cut to General and Admiral Positions
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is expected to announce Wednesday that the Pentagon will cut 20% of positions designated for generals and admirals across the U.S. military, a major restructuring of senior leadership. The announcement is expected during an address at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia and expands on reductions Hegseth ordered last year.
This isn’t trimming around the edges—Hegseth is taking another sizable swing at the Pentagon’s command structure.
Hegseth ordered a minimum 10% reduction in general and flag officers in May 2025, along with a 20% reduction among National Guard general officers. He said the goal was to “drive innovation and operational excellence” and eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic layers. As of July, the military had 851 active-duty generals and admirals, compared with 848 a year earlier and a statutory cap of 857.
The overhaul is also fueling an argument over what those senior officers contribute. Critics of a top-heavy military say too many high-ranking officers create bureaucracy and slow decisions; defenders argue senior commanders are increasingly necessary to manage multinational alliances, emerging technology, and the Pentagon’s enormous complexity. Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly criticized Hegseth’s personnel changes Tuesday, saying, “We need strong leaders. These folks have decades of experience, some of the best leadership our military has ever had. He’s getting rid of them.”
At least 20 generals, admirals, and civilian military leaders have been fired or resigned since Hegseth became defense secretary, according to CBS News, including several of the military’s most senior uniformed officials.
Editor: There’s streamlining the chain of command, and then there’s taking a Weedwacker to the org chart. The real test isn’t how many stars disappear—it’s whether the Pentagon actually works better afterward.
Source: CBS News
Valar Atomics wants to build 456 small nuclear reactors on more than 9,000 acres of federal land in Utah, producing enough electricity to dwarf the state’s current average generation—and apparently “small modular reactor” does not mean small ambition.
456 Nuclear Reactors in Utah? Valar Atomics Unveils Massive Project Beehive
Nuclear startup Valar Atomics is proposing a sprawling Utah energy complex featuring roughly 456 small reactors, data centers, nuclear-fuel production, and waste storage on more than 9,000 acres of federal land. Dubbed “Project Beehive,” the proposed facility near Price would generate about 9.6 gigawatts of electricity, compared with roughly 4 gigawatts that Utah currently produces on average.
This isn’t a nuclear power plant—it’s basically a nuclear power city built to feed the data-center boom.
Valar hopes to begin nonnuclear construction as soon as the end of 2026, bring the first reactors online in 2028, and potentially complete the site by 2032. The plan relies on 25-megawatt reactors that could be installed incrementally, an approach Valar and other nuclear startups argue could make nuclear power faster and cheaper to deploy than conventional multibillion-dollar plants.
The proposal is already drawing scrutiny over its enormous footprint and proposed use of public land. The Bureau of Land Management confirmed it received Valar’s application and said it is reviewing it for completeness, with public input expected during the environmental review. Environmental advocates are raising questions about placing reactors, data centers, and nuclear-waste storage on federal land. “If we have facilities like this on public land for waste storage, for massive nuclear development, for data centers, that’s going to have tremendous implications for how public lands are used,” Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah executive director Lexi Tuddenham told NPR.
Valar’s Ward 250 test reactor reached criticality in June and produced electricity in July, when CEO Isaiah Taylor declared, “Ladies and gentlemen, Valar Atomics just became the first startup in history to make nuclear electricity right here.” Project Beehive would take that experiment and multiply the ambition several hundred times over.
Editor: Silicon Valley wanted unlimited power for AI, and apparently somebody looked at a server farm and said, “Fine, give it 456 nuclear reactors.”
Source: NPR
A lawsuit accusing seven Cornell fraternity members of sexually assaulting a student has reignited the national fight over campus assault, consent, and due process—even as prosecutors say the account they received in 2024 differed from allegations now in court.
Cornell ‘7’ Sexual Assault Lawsuit Reopens America’s Campus Consent Debate
A 101-page lawsuit accusing seven members of Cornell University’s Chi Phi fraternity of participating in the sexual assault of a 20-year-old sorority member has exploded into a national controversy over campus safety, consent, and how allegations should be investigated. The lawsuit, filed Sept. 16, alleges a drug-fueled, hours-long encounter in 2024 and includes a screenshot of a Snapchat message in which one man allegedly wrote there was “free p*ssy.”
But the social-media verdict arrived long before anything resembling a courtroom verdict.
Attorneys for two of the accused men have denied the allegations, while Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten has said the woman’s original 2024 account described “her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual.” He has since announced that his office will reopen the case, acknowledging that sexual-assault victims can take years to process what happened. Meanwhile, social media users have circulated identities and photos of men dubbed the “Cornell 7,” while others have warned against reaching conclusions before the allegations are adjudicated.
The case has also revived a much broader argument over Title IX and how colleges handle sexual misconduct. Policies and regulations have changed across successive presidential administrations, with continuing disputes over protections for complainants and due-process rights for accused students. Cornell, meanwhile, barred Chi Phi from campus and created a sexual-assault task force, but some students say they still want more transparency about what happened.
The unresolved facts make this a particularly combustible case: a serious civil complaint, criminal charges that were not initially filed, a reopened investigation, and an internet already choosing sides. Cornell senior Saanya Agarwal described what that uncertainty feels like on campus: “There’s so much distrust and that also creates fear, understandably so, because we don’t know what’s going on.”
Editor: Sexual-assault allegations deserve serious investigation, and the accused deserve due process. Social media, unfortunately, specializes in skipping straight to sentencing.
Source: CNN
Florida executed Curtis Beasley for a 1995 hammer murder, making him the state’s 16th execution this year as Florida continues a pace that has turned death warrants into something resembling a very grim calendar.
Florida Executes Curtis Beasley, Its 16th Execution of 2026
Florida executed 77-year-old Curtis Beasley by lethal injection Tuesday for the 1995 murder of Carolyn Monfort, bringing the state’s execution total to 16 this year. Beasley was pronounced dead at 6:12 p.m. EDT after last-minute legal efforts failed and Gov. Ron DeSantis declined calls from Catholic leaders and death-penalty opponents to stop the execution.
Florida is now just three executions away from matching the state record of 19 it set last year.
Prosecutors said Beasley was staying at 62-year-old Monfort’s home when she was beaten to death with a claw hammer in August 1995. They said he stole $800 and her car before leaving Florida and was arrested in Alabama five months later. Beasley maintained his innocence, and his attorneys emphasized there were no eyewitnesses, fingerprints, or confession. Investigators, however, found Monfort’s blood on a shirt identified as Beasley’s.
His lawyers challenged the execution on several grounds, including his age, health, and concerns surrounding his non-unanimous death sentence. The Florida Supreme Court rejected his appeal last week, and the U.S. Supreme Court denied another appeal just hours before the execution. Opponents also demonstrated against the execution, arguing Florida is accelerating executions even as new death sentences remain historically low.
Beasley became the 29th person executed in the United States this year and the 43rd during DeSantis’ tenure as governor. Florida already has two more executions scheduled for October.
Editor: Whatever your position on capital punishment, 16 executions in nine months is no longer an occasional exercise of state power—it’s a policy operating at full throttle.
Source: UPI
The Supreme Court has temporarily cleared the Trump administration to resume rapid deportations to third countries without the advance notice required by a lower court, while agreeing to decide the underlying legal fight in December—the immigration policy equivalent of hitting “continue” while the terms and conditions are still being litigated.
Supreme Court Lets Trump Resume Rapid Third-Country Deportations—for Now
The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Trump administration to continue its policy of rapidly deporting migrants to third countries while the justices prepare to hear arguments over whether the policy is lawful. The Court stayed a lower-court ruling and agreed to hear the case in December. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the stay.
The administration gets to keep the deportation machinery running while the Supreme Court decides whether some of its most controversial procedures are legal.
The dispute centers on migrants being sent to countries other than their own and what notice and opportunity they must receive to object, including when they fear persecution or torture at the destination. A three-judge First Circuit panel ruled that migrants were not receiving adequate notice, with Judge Seth Aframe writing that the right to challenge removal “means little” without prior notice of the intended destination and a meaningful opportunity to contest it.
Immigrant-rights organizations Human Rights First and Refugees International estimate that about 25,000 people have been deported to third countries during the administration’s immigration crackdown. Immigration lawyers say third-country removals themselves are not new, but the administration has expanded their use through arrangements with nearly three dozen countries. The Supreme Court’s temporary order does not resolve whether those procedures comply with federal law and constitutional due-process protections.
Attorney Trina Realmuto, who challenged the administration’s policy, called the stay “a devastating result” for migrants who could be placed aboard flights before raising fear claims, but emphasized that the Court has not yet decided whether the policy itself is lawful.
Editor: That distinction matters. The Supreme Court just gave the administration a green light to keep driving—it hasn’t decided whether the road itself is legal.
Source: ABC News